Exposing Another Narrative For The Oklahoma City Bombing

This morning we welcomed former legislator, Charles Key, to the podcast to talk about his research regarding the Oklahoma City bombing.

An Oklahoma Representative in 1995, Key used his role to create a committee that performed an in depth investigation of the bombing which, in 2001, produced at 555 page report full of interviews, photographs and research. For many years, Key has spoken on their research and for as many years, he’s been vilified by Oklahomans who don’t want another explanation other than terrorism for that tragic, horrific loss of life that resulted from the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Building in downtown Oklahoma City. Additionally, many people don’t want to believe their government could – or would – do anything to hurt them, so it became easier to vilify Key rather than actually looking at the work he spent years doing so that Oklahomans would have access to the truth and not just a government – or media – narrative.

Interestingly, today’s podcast started out a mess. My internet wouldn’t support the podcast and I had to get in and out of the streaming program several times to get it to load. We had to go live late and even then, I was frozen for a bit before my internet finally worked. Charles couldn’t get his slide show to load. Then, Charles’ internet connection kept going in and out on him. It was VERY hard not to succumb to a voice in my head screaming “CONSPIRACY”! (I’m only sort of joking here! LOL). Though I’ve taken a few clips – which I’ll post below – you’ll want to watch the full podcast on YouTube and Rumble. Even at two full hours, we only got midway through Key’s presentation, so he’ll be back to finish on Wednesday, August 13th at 9am, so mark your calendars accordingly.

To cut to the chase, Key – and the committee – believe that the OKC bombing was a sting operation by the ATF that went bad, not a terrorist-planned plot. In this particular clip, Charles makes the point that, although the Murrah building was home to the ATF, the ATF wasn’t at home the morning of the bombing and witness after witness testified to that fact.

In the clip below, Charles talks about all the witnesses around the Murrah Building who saw Timothy McVeigh with one or two other men – none of whom wereTerry Nichols. What about these men? Why did no one track them down? Why were they not part of a further investigation? Just this situation alone provides way too many questions about the accepted narrative.

In no way was the report prepared by Charles Key and the committee meant to hurt bombing survivors, or to make their horrific situation anything other than exactly what it was – horrific. It was simply meant to bring truth and transparency to a terrible event for which the narrative created by the government and the media didn’t fit once people began to look closely.

In America, we are to be free to question our government; to examine it’s answers for things like the bombing, or 9/11, or where our tax dollars go, or what its divisions – secret and not – do. We have the right to ask if our government is spying on us, or funding regime change efforts resulting in the deaths of Americans, or if a three-letter agency ran an operation meant to do something to scare people or otherwise propel them into asking for legislation that would give them more power over the American people, or that framed American citizens for something they didn’t do that they government agents did instead.

So, if you think Charles Key is a crackpot, or you’re offended (like YouTube apparently!) that we have the temerity to buck the words the government strings together and tells us about certain things, this podcast probably isn’t for you. If, on the other hand, you like to practice discernment and critical thinking that might mean once-cherished ideas shatter like glass that get swept into the trash at the end of the day, hang out here with us, we’ve got your number.