Oklahoma houses the largest carbon capture plant in the U.S., which was largely unknown to locals, including officials. This technology poses questions about regulation and safety, particularly after incidents elsewhere. Governor Stitt’s lack of transparency and responsiveness to constituents, highlights concerns over the implications of carbon capture technologies and the state’s energy policies.
On November 20th, an interview with Chad McDougall revealed Oklahoma’s energy dynamics: the state produces significantly more energy than it uses, yet wind companies exploit local resources, harming landscapes and costing taxpayers. Wind subsidies continue despite cessation in 2017, raising questions about energy policies while residents face higher bills amid governmental favoritism toward green companies.
On November 15th, Julianne Romanello discussed carbon credits and Oklahoma’s position in the green energy economy. She criticized the state’s involvement in carbon capture, hydrogen fuel production, and federal funding tied to net-zero emissions goals. Concerns arise over potential conflicts of interest among legislators and the motives behind pursuing green initiatives in a mainly oil-oriented economy.
Saundra Traywick discovered plans for a vast electrical transmission corridor in Oklahoma tied to the state’s ‘green agenda’, which includes wind turbines, solar energy, and carbon capture projects funded by the federal government. This has raised concerns about private land rights being compromised and transparency issues surrounding public-private partnerships in energy funding.