Today, Mary from V1SUT Vantage and Roberta Lewis from Moms 4 Liberty, joined me to talk about the recent Governor Stitt appointment to the Oklahoma State School Board – Chris VanDenhende.
Immediately after my friend Kendra Wesson and two other board members were unceremoniously removed from the Oklahoma State School Board by Governor Kevin Stitt due to “political drama” (which turned out to be instituting a process of enumerating the number of kids here illegally enrolled in public schools – something schools HAVE to do to satisfy federal regulations anyway), three new members were appointed.
Today, Mary also wrote a piece about VanDenhende – who has served as an appointee to the Board of Regents for the Regional University System of Oklahoma (RUSO) as well – proving again, my point about the revolving door among previous board/commission appointees, former legislators, lobbyists and government. Here, she puts businesses run by VanDenhende together with the MOU that Governor Stitt signed with Denmark earlier this year. Interestingly, Mary points out that VanDenhende makes just the kind of airplane fuel outlined in the MOU.
Roberta Lewis with Moms 4 Liberty showed us a TicTok video on The Woke Mob channel (formerly the Oklahoma chapter of the national Defense of Democracy organization apparently), where VanDenhende is arguing with Ryan Walters over what made a lie, or merely statements that weren’t “100% accurate”. It’s not the video that was so interesting, however, it was the comments section. Two women, identifying as the daughters of VanDenhende lauded their father’s actions and thanked other commenters for their appreciation.
No, children are not always chips off the old block, but this group is very leftist and quite ugly. Seeing this certainly gives a bit of pause.
The live video where we discuss all these matters – and a truly awful situation with a child at Shawnee high school – can be found on our YouTube and Rumble channels and embedded below. Please take a few minutes to pass this information on to your Senator so they may at least have exposure to this information and then ask if they would NOT confirm Chris VanDenhende to the State Board of Education.
According to a press release sent out by Senate Media, the bill, “empower[s] schools to adopt ‘bell to bell’ cell phone policies”, yet the bill summary says, “An Act relating to schools; requiring school district boards of education to adopt a policy prohibiting use of cell phones while on campus during certain time period”. Requiring and ’empowering’ do not have the same meaning – the first includes force.
In fact, the bill goes on to say that it will require schools to set discipline policies for students who break the school’s required policy on cell phone use (the force part). Originally, it had allotted up to 2 million taxpayer dollars (“if available”, whatever that means) to be granted to middle and high schools so they can buy something to STORE cell phones during the day. Because a basket can’t hold cell phones in a classroom and we need a cabinet (or something) for THE SCHOOL to hold EVERY STUDENT’S cell phone.
Problems With The Bill
What is the point of a school board? According to state law, individual local school boards have the right and ability to set policy – including policy over cell phones. This bill actively usurps local school board authority by forcing them to create a policy. On one hand, we expect parents to execute control over their minor children, yet so much of what the state does actually removes parental executive control in favor of a government policy, rule or law. How can a parent execute parental control if we keep removing their executive function?
This is NEW LAW. How many laws do Oklahomans need to restrain them – or, in this case, their children? What about schools? Could an argument be made that part of the reason public schools in Oklahoma are failing is that they are constrained by state laws that may not have been needed at the local level? How many laws does Oklahoma actually need – especially when this one has no teeth, making it a suggestion.
This law forces schools to create disciplinary actions to be meted out when students break cell phone policy. What happens if a school DOESN’T create a cell phone policy? What happens if they don’t create a discipline policy? How many times has state law required schools to create a policy, but then never forced the school to write the policy when they don’t? Tulsa attorney Maria Seidler has told us numerous times, for example, that public schools don’t adhere to all of Oklahoma’s Parental Rights law, but there isn’t an enforcement mechanism in the law to make them, forcing parents to use their own money to sue schools while schools use taxpayer dollars to fight them. How many times has the state forced schools to follow the policies they DO create – about bathrooms, free speech, bullying, or student safety, for example? This law, then, would be meaningless, just like so many others our legislature creates, because there isn’t a mechanism of enforcement.
Our state has real problems with school employees who misuse and abuse children in their care. We have only to look at the number of multi-million dollar lawsuits being settled by schools in the last several years like Kingfisher and Ninnekah and Salina and Perry and Shawnee and Wewoka… Yet, parents who suggest CCTV for classrooms are confronted with an uproar like a tsunami from certain teachers and administrators against such a thing. Now, we want to remove the only way students have to ‘catch’ a school employee doing something they shouldn’t be doing. Just this thought should be concerning.
So much learning is now done on computers but somehow the kid’s cell phones are causing distraction? How does that work? Countless studies have shown that computer learning isn’t the best thing for students, but not only do we still do it, there are real problems with students accessing porn and other sites, as former Oklahoma resident Denise Roberts told us during an interview on our podcast – but cell phones are the problem?
This is a national movement. Why? Why we are attempting to do what so many other states are doing? Why do we play Follow The Leader so often in Oklahoma when we’re an individual state. What about, “I don’t care what the other kids do”. What about being an “laboratories of Democracy“?
Each and every teacher could create their own class rules about cell phones, but we’re not letting them – “Put the phones in the basket on my desk until the end of class everyone”. We’re telling teachers that we don’t trust them with a policy over a cell phone, but you trust them to educate the kids in their class? How much sense does that make? This is all talk out of both sides of the mouth of the legislature – here, have more money teachers – but you can’t manage your own classroom.
Bottom line. This is a bill in search of a problem that already has a solution. This isn’t even a bandaid for the horrible educational results we have in this state. This bill is vanity, not good governance.
Contact the Senate Education Committee and ask them to say NO to SB1389.
ASAP ACTION ITEM: Oklahoma Republicans Stopping School Board, Ranked Choice Voting and Medical Freedom Bills!! DEADLINE FOR BILLS TO BE HEARD IS THURSDAY, 3/14/24!
PLEASE WATCH AND SHARE: Republicans are blocking HB3563 moving school board elections to November.
Medical lobbyists are contacting legislators wanting to stop the panel on Medical Freedom being held March 26th at the Capitol in room 112.2. In addition, they don’t want the Kevin West bill supported by this study – HB3214, the Medical Ethics Defense Act – heard.
House bills preventing Ranked Choice Voting are also being denied a hearing – particularly HB3156 and HJR1048. (See our video about Ranked Choice Voting HERE)
Please IMMEDIATELY call your Representative and tell them that you – as a constituent, not a lobbyist – want these bills to get a hearing before the House.
If you don’t know their number, dial the general number here and ask for their office: (405) 521-2711
If you don’t follow Janice Danforth, Moms For Liberty Tulsa Chapter Chair, whether on Facebook or X (Twitter), you should. They’ve helped to orchestrate training for school board candidates, so please reach out if you’re interested!
Leadership Institute ALSO has a school board training program that you should check out!
OKLAHOMA ELECTION INFORMATION
Filing for the 2024 school board elections is in December 2023. Below is a list of seats up for election in the largest seven districts. For the remaining 500 districts, please internet search for your local school district board and check to see which members board terms are expiring in 2024.
Guest Post By Dayna Mooney – Chapter Chair, Moms For Liberty (Canadian County, OK)
Like many Parents, we have discovered things being taught to our children with which we disagree.
Some members have even taken it further and begun researching the curricula being used, looking into Teachers that are in our schools, books in our School Library or even considered running for a School Board seat themselves.
For me, it was the COVID lockdowns that lead me to see what my children were being taught and what they weren’t being taught, a discovery that eventually lead me to start a Chapter in Canadian County for Moms for Liberty. Moms for Liberty works to empower Parents to advocate for their children and take back their Parental Rights.
During each of our Chapter meetings, we review School Board Agendas for School Districts that are represented within our Chapter.
During the October 27th Chapter meeting of last year (2022) we discussed Out of State Approvals for Yukon Public Schools, in particular an approval for the District Social Studies Curriculum Coordinator to attend the National Council for Social Studies Conference in Philadelphia, PA, December 1-4, 2022. Curious, we researched further.
It turns out, this conference is one of the largest gathering of K-12 social studies classroom teachers in the US. While we have no idea which of the 500+ sessions this teacher chose to attend, these were the 6 Sub Themes covered in this Conference:
Connecting Educators as Learners
Teaching Civil Discourse
Embracing Hard History
Building Critical Media Literacy
Fostering Global Citizens
Navigating the Political Landscape in Teaching Social Studies
These were some of the Workshops/Sessions available at this Conference:
Teaching History for Justice
Critical Race Theory and Social Studies Futures
Be(com)ing Stranger: Towards a Posthuman Social Studies
Proceeding with Caution and Care: Examining Classroom Simulations Through the Lens of Educational Equity
Participants will investigate classroom simulations, focusing on the challenges and dangers that surround their use. Presenters will provide administrators and supervisors strategies for identifying harmful simulations and how to coach teachers away from using them and move toward more culturally responsive, culturally sensitive, and more equitable and inclusive classroom activities
Embracing Student Activism
How a Pride Flag led to lobbying in Congress: learn how a school district located on indigenous territory embraced student activism and the opportunities it created
Mind the Gap: Tackling Conspiracy Theories in the Classroom
Combatting the prevalence of misinformation available to students is a challenge in classrooms today. Discover strategies for debunking common 9/11 conspiracy theories that translate across a variety of content and subjects.
Exploring Primary Sources in Ethnic Studies: Using the Library of Congress to Create School District Professional Development
Learn how Houston ISD leveraged their Teaching with Primary Sources grant award to expand teacher access to ethnic studies knowledge, teaching resources, and curriculum
Teaching Critical Race Theory with Primary Source Documents
Learn how two educators used primary sources to support the curriculum of a dedicated Critical Race Theory class at the college level. Connections to the K-12 classroom will be shared
How to Teach the Truth and Not End Up in the Principal’s Office
The Library of Congress and the TPS Teachers Network have resources and professional support to aid educators in their quest to teach accurate history in an era of divisive topics laws.
Diversity and Inclusion Pedagogy for Teaching Global Learning and Leadership
Explore project-based instructional techniques and best practices that empower and immerse students more deeply in the Global Citizenship learning experience by utilizing diverse and inclusive student-led engagement activities
The 1619 Project, Critical Race Theory, Divisive Concepts Legislation: Empowering Teachers and Communities to Confront the Politicization of Social Studies
Unravel the politicization of the 1619 Project, Critical Race Theory, and divisive concepts legislation with other educators who seek to confront racialized rhetoric with truth
Fostering Community, Understanding, and Growth Through Civil Dialogue
Explore meaningful methods for creating, building, and fostering civil dialogue techniques with your students to increase content understanding, promote social-emotional learning, and maintain community among your students.
The Color of Law: Exploring Systemic Racism in Housing Policy Using PBL
Using the project-based learning model, U.S. History/Government teachers can position students to raise awareness of systemic racism in housing policy using Richard Rothstein’s 2017 book The Color of Law.
Truth and Reconciliation: Sexual Slavery During World War II
Inquiry about sexual slavery during World War II with embedded best Social Emotional Learning practices by examining transgressions of the past and truth and reconciliation
Don’t End up on the News! A Trauma-Informed Approach to Teaching Hard History
Don’t let the headlines scare you! New teachers, let’s talk about ways to approach hard history using trauma-informed best practices
Teaching Untold Stories to Inspire Children as Changemakers
Challenge the dominant discourse of the civil rights movement in elementary social studies and, instead, embrace teaching unsung heroes in an effort to create social justice advocates in our students
Combating Misinformation with Culturally Responsive Teaching
Explore innovative approaches for designing and implementing culturally responsive instruction. With a firm understanding of these techniques and principles, attendees will reap the benefits of these lessons
Reimagining Civic Action: Human Rights Close to Home
Hear youth scholars and educators share how Human Rights Education can serve as a blueprint for experiential learning that promotes student civic engagement and activism
As you can see, there was a theme to what was being discussed at this Conference. Any teachers in attendance will then bring what they’ve learned back to the District and share it with their fellow teachers, maybe even during a Professional Development, or other training day.
As you can see with the picture below Critical Race Theory, Cultural Relevant Pedagogy, Multicultural Education and Civil Rights Movement are all one in the same. Many use buzz words to get around Critical Race Theory laws within the State in order to continue teaching it in our Schools.
Another commonly known buzz word that we hear now is Social Emotional Learning or SEL, MANY Schools, if not all are using some type of SEL Program within our Schools. All of these are vehicles for Critical Race Theory, no matter what you call them and are designed to infringe on a Parent’s Right to educate their children in the worldview of their family. These programs promote feelings and behaviors that are not usually reflective of our teachings as the parent.
In December of 2020, CASEL (Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning) updated their definition for SEL to showcase the value of SEL as a weapon for social justice. These SEL programs gather non-cognitive data using attributes, feelings, grit, mindsets and more that’s been gathered through various programs and different terminology. None of which can be fairly assessed with a computer.
Do you remember Common Core that’s also against the law to teach in Oklahoma? SEL, CRT are just the newest versions of Common Core, just a different name, pretty bow on the surface that ultimately pushes the same message that focuses less on academics and more on mindsets, feelings and behaviors. SEL claims to improve test scores, but as we are seeing by the latest release, it’s done the opposite. Just one of many claims, that have all proven to do the opposite.
All of these programs, no matter what you call them, get in the way of good, efficient teaching. Teachers are being asked to take on the role therapists, which they aren’t trained for, nor do they want to be therapists in most cases. Running off good teachers, to make way for the activist teachers to be the student’s parent, tell them how to think and how to hate their Country!
As Parents, we have to stand up against this agenda and do our part to get our Education System back on track! Even if your children are grown, you have a place in this fight as well! The more the merrier!
These are some results of SEL Teachings. You may already be seeing them in your School;
Larger Class Sizes
More about Diversity
Changes to what was once a Zero Tolerance Policy
Grading Policy Changes on some or all Levels
School(s) are becoming overpopulated
Follow the link below to see a graphic to connect CRT to SEL and more
For years, ROPE has been preaching about the importance of SCHOOL BOARD RACES to parents and students. Although many people don’t realize it, SCHOOL BOARDS have nearly ALL THE POWER in a school! NOT the superintendent – THE BOARD – which should be IDEALLY made up of parents with children in the school.
If you are interested in running for school board, you must RUN to your county election board ASAP. The date for filing for running STARTS TOMORROW – December 5-7th! Go to your COUNTY Election Board to file. Please see THIS LINK for the filing packet and all information regarding School Board Elections.
Here’s a table that gives you information on WHAT a School Board member should do – as opposed to what the Superintendent should do.
Here’s a link to Title 70 Section 70-3-104, “State Board of Education – Powers and duties” in the event you’d like to see for yourself.
In the event that you would like to have a candidate forum in your area – or simply ask questions of your school board candidates, we’ve developed the 20 below for your use!
20 QUESTIONS FOR SCHOOL BOARD CANDIDATES
Do you know how to tell male from female in most species of mammals in North America? Should an educator be required to reach that level of competency?
What are the pros and cons of A-B schedules?
Should your Superintendent have the wisdom to fire teachers who provide litter boxes or sexual instruction for children?
How many administrators does it take to provide programs that have nothing to do with education?
How many federal grants does it take to prevent the need for parents?
Are you opposed to parents taking the main role in raising their children (education, food, transportation, and entertainment, physical and mental health care, sex ed, spiritual guidance)?
At what age is it educational for a teacher or librarian to offer your child pornography?
Do you trust trained teachers to carry a firearm in class to protect themselves and their students?
Will you have concerned parents arrested for attending school board meetings?
Do you want to take your school board training from a “non-profit” who makes $Millions per year and considers concerned parents domestic terrorists?
Are you for or against adults having sex with minors?
Should school counselors be allowed to advise children to keep secrets from parents, or encourage them to have sex or to have medical procedures?
Who do school board members work for?
Should children be masked and treated like lepers when .005% of them get sick? Should schools close down for those statistics?
What are the pros and cons of virtual schools?
Should parents be allowed entry to see their children or faculty during the school day?
Are you familiar with Social Emotional Learning, Critical Race Theory, Diversity Equity and Inclusion, as well as Environmental Social Governance programs and their application in the classroom?
Should schools follow the spirit of a law even if they can find a loophole?
What challenges do you expect as a member of your school board?
Do you have the guts to stand strong against absurdity to protect Oklahoma children even when the globalists offer you or your school money?
Now that you have a big chunk of information to help you either RUN or VOTE for your local school board candidate – GET OUT THERE AND GET INVOLVED!!!
In a post made to the Edmond Public Schools website, Superintendent Dr. Grunewald addressed what she characterized as “negative and sometimes false comments” made by parents at the 11.1.21 Board Meeting. On the playground we used to say, “It takes one to know one.” Dr. Grunewald’s response to parents in this missive is either deliberately false, or – worse – uninformed by reality. Here’s how we know.
I have known Molly Jenkins – like every other ROPE Board Member – for 8-10 years. She’s tough and smart and like the rest of us, VERY concerned about what is happening to our children in public education.
In the Spring of 2021, she was very troubled by an assignment that was brought to the attention of the EPS Board at a regular Board meeting by a parent who was alerted to the assignment by their child who was completing work online due to COVID.
The class was reading The Absolutely True Diary of A Part Time Indian, a book about a native American boy who lives on a reservation, has troubles in school, reads books and draws cartoons.
Unfortunately, what might be a really interesting book, centers a great deal on the differences between Native Americans and white people from his perspective. Another book in a long litany of books for young adults that introduce race (or sexuality) as a way of indoctrinating readers into certain worldviews.
In May, after the passage of HB1775 preventing the teaching of Critical Race Theory ideals, Molly – still concerned about the “white vs indian” assignment she’d seen – drove to the EPS Administration building and asked for a meeting with Superintendent Grunewald.
She wanted to speak with the Superintendent personally to make certain they were going to follow HB1775 after seeing what she felt to be a completely inappropriate narrative. An appointment was made and on the day she returned for the meeting with Dr. Grunewald, she was interested to find 10-12 copies of a book sitting on a table in her office with the word ‘equity’ in the title.
“That looks like an interesting book,” she remarked to the Superintendent who then suggested she take a copy to read.
During the meeting, Molly shared her CRT concerns with Dr. Grunewald who assured her they were not teaching CRT tenets in Edmond Public Schools. So, with little further to say after that ‘assurance’, Molly headed home to read the book she was given.
Once home, it took her just about four hours to read the book from cover to cover, she found it so unnerving. On nearly every page she made notes to herself about what she was reading and how it directly connected to the ideals which derive from CRT – the ones specifically outlawed by HB1775.
After reading the book, she immediately contacted EPS Administration to make a further appointment with Dr. Grunewald, which was granted.
At that meeting, she explained to the Superintendent what she had found in the book and that she found CRT tenets on nearly every page.
She asked Dr. Grunewald if she had read the book in its entirety and was told NO, BUT SHE HAD SCANNED IT.
Molly asked the Superintendent who she was giving the book to read – since there had been numerous copies on the table. Dr. Grunewald would NOT give her a clear answer, saying only, “some people around here”. She felt that the Superintendent was very dismissive with her – almost a “you do you we’ll do us” kind of attitude.
Look at the first bullet point. Now, look at this:
What Dr. Grunewald said was simply a talking point described by leftist educators to defend against the use of CRT in schools. In literally means nothing. It’s a deflection for parents who have done their homework and know better.
Bullet point 2 – no one has said it was a standard. Another deflection.
Bullet point 3 – this point references the book we’ll discuss in the next frame – “Belonging Through A Culture of Dignity”.
Bullet point 4 – SEL=CRT. Guest poster Emily Wright (EPS mom of 3) made that abundantly clear in her blog of this week. You can find that here. SEL is Social Emotional Learning, another education fad created by a bunch of leftist teachers in order to indoctrinate children. If you don’t believe me, read this page. Talk about mumbo-jumbo, word salad – not to mention that children’s EMOTIONS are strictly the territory of PARENTS, not schools.
In this portion of her response, Dr. Grunewald claims she’s read the book “Belonging Through a Culture of Dignity”. Here’s what WalMart said about the book when I went searching for it.
“Once these fundamental human needs are understood, educators can gain clarity of the barriers to meaningful student relationships, especially across dimensions of difference such as race, class and culture…Through their work, the authors aim to equip educators with the tools necessary to deliver the promise of DEMOCRACY through schools by breaking the cycle of equity dysfunction once and for all.”
Belonging Through a Culture of Dignity: The Keys to Successful Equity Implementation Kindle Edition by Floyd Cobb (Author), John Krownapple (Author), Brenda CampbellJones (Foreword)
FULL STOP. There is so much wrong with those sentences it’s hard to breakdown in a blog, but let me do it by asking some questions:
How did public schools create students OF EVERY COLOR and sex smart enough to put a man on the moon without this tripe?
Has anyone looked to see what the National Assessment of Academic Progress scores of Oklahoma students are in Math, Science and Reading? (I have – they’re dismal and have been for a decade) Have schools been teaching, or modifying behaviors?
If you specifically hone in on race, class and culture do you make disparities clearer to children or less clear?
Since when are schools a DEMOCRACY?
Who says there is a “cycle of equity dysfunction” except for the people like Dr. Becky Bailey who stand to make a KILLING on all the stuff she sells to promote ‘dignity’ through SEL programming? Is this about money or the welfare of kids?
Molly read the entire book. Here are some of the most horrifying nuggets from the book:
Pg 42: “Schools routinely offer our students on the margins (e.g., impoverished and minoritized) inferior academic experience to students of affluence and cultural dominance. – Nor did it require educators to prioritize a sense of belonging for students racialized as Black (or otherwise) who were displaced and had to leave the safety and belonging of home schools and move into often unwelcoming school cultures that were exclusively White. Thus a “belonging gap” emerged within racially integrated schools. (Hilariously, ‘bussing’ was created by liberals believing that black students couldn’t possibly get a good education in black schools – a racist notion in and of itself – so they moved them from their homes into white areas to get equal access to education excellence. Yet another one of the ‘liberals screw it up and screw it up worse trying to fix their original screw up’ because they simply have to find fault with something all the time.)
Pg 62: The whole page is filled with racist nonsense, but here are a few examples: “To redress inequity and create a socially just system of education, ensuring access is not enough For educational equity, access and belonging are both vital”. “Historically marginalized identity groups are most vulnerable to the stereotype threat and belonging uncertainty when aspiring to achieve in the dominant culture.”
pg 76: “Perhaps the concept of race (being White, more specifically) is the most prominent example of social exclusion and belonging in US history.”
pg 77: “Whiteness, as Joe Feagin (2013) argues, is more definitely characterized as the absolute right to exclude and, ultimately the entitlement to determine who belongs.” “Entitlement has determined, among other things, where groups of people can live or work, whether or not they have basic rights (e.g., voting, health care), and what type of social activities and relationships they can have with whom (e.g. marriage). In 2018 and 2019, the hashtag #LivingWhileBlack went viral on social media, documenting racial exclusivity Droves of videos show White Americans calling the police on everyday people – Black, Latinx, Muslim, Americans – going about their lives (without markers of Whiteness in places where they are perceived not to belong: Starbucks, swimming pools, golf courses, fitness centers, sidewalks, parks, picnic tables, libraries, college campus tours, and more. To this day, the markers of race often determine the extent to which people feel they belong in any given environment.”
Look up HB1775 and then compare that to these book excerpts. Everything here DEFIES letters a, b, f, g and h of that bill, causing the book – and Dr. Grunewald by pushing it – to violate HB1775.
Now let’s look at her next statement:
Once again, we find that Grunewald has little to say but echoing the talking points of others in the public education cabal.
And now, how about the concept that we must ‘heal the child before we can educate the child’? That’s a concept that’s been pushed since John Dewey wanted to take control of society by getting between parent and child since parent wouldn’t necessarily bring the child up to be a democratic socialist the way he envisioned children should be brought up. (Read more about Dewey in “John Dewey & the Decline of American Education: How The Patron Saint of Schools Has Corrupted Teaching & Learning” – It was VERY enlightening about why public education is the way it is.)
Now look at her last bullet point.
So they’ve increased the number of counselors. Why? Because the state Department of Education gave schools money to hire counselors – $35 million dollars in ESSR funds to be exact – because, well, COVID. Schools pay half – the state pays half – everyone’s happy. Except that the “School Counselor Corps” as they are being called, apparently come mainly from the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) – an organization that says:
School counselors work toward cultural competence and engage in anti-racist actions by advocating to change racist policies, procedures, practices, guidelines and laws contributing to inequities in students’ academic, career and social/emotional development
American School Counselors Association
You can see more about the ASCA here. The ASCA also pushes SEL, driving more CRT tenets into children through counseling and data-collection surveys (from the company owned by the husband of the daughter of Merrick Garland, the federal Attorney General who told the FBI to investigate parents at school board meetings – oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.)
So, yet again, Superintendent Grunewald seems to literally be falsifying information or have no idea what she’s reading, what she’s saying or what goes on in her own schools.
Clearly EPS is saturated with SEL and clearly, SEL is the pipeline for CRT pushed by counseling services and Dr. Grunewald herself through “Belonging Through a Culture of Dignity”.
In closing, Dr. Grunewald is doing little more than many Superintendents do anymore when confronted by parents who actually care – they are either outright lying, or are too soaked in their own indoctrination to understand what they’re doing to our kids.
This is another excellent reason why SCHOOL BOARD ELECTIONS ARE PARAMOUNT. School boards can literally get rid of these kinds of Superintendents and hire ones that actually care about kids, not merely pushing what the education cabal wants pushed on kids.
GET INVOLVED IN SCHOOL BOARDS AND SCHOOL BOARD RACES IN YOUR DISTRICT TODAY!