Search

ROPE Report

Month

April 2024

Why Do Questions About Oklahoma Elections Cause Push Back From Oklahoma Election Officials?

Friday, April 26th, ROPE Report Live interviewed Ric Moore – a Canadian County election official – about something interesting that had happened to him during the last election. Wendi Montgomery Dial and Amber Evans also joined us for a continued discussion about what happened to Ric AND the interesting Contest of Candidacy held by the Oklahoma State Election Board at the state capitol on Thursday, April 18th between sitting Representative Clay Staires and Libertarian candidate, Kenneth Blevins.

The ENTIRE live video can be found on both our Rumble and YouTube channels, but I’ve broken the live video down into several short videos so you can watch them as you have time because THEY ARE VERY IMPORTANT.

Here is Ric Moore explaining what happened to him when he took a picture of the back of his car, which contained all the items he had picked up from the Canadian County Election Board the Monday evening before the Tuesday election. He posted the photo to a group chat on Telegram (a messaging app) and noted how unsecured all the election paraphernalia is after it’s picked up from the election board. Wendi then picked up the photo and posted it to one of her social media accounts. When Ric drops off his machine at the Canadian County Election Board after the election was over, he was confronted with Wendi’s post and ushered into a meeting with Canadian County election officials and a Sheriff’s deputy.

The edit is a bit choppy, but I tried to pick the parts of the conversation that explain everything that happened and knit them together for the shortest possible time commitment!

Later on in the conversation, Wendi and Amber Evans, Michael and I, discussed the Contest of Candidacy brought by sitting Representative Clay Staires against Libertarian candidate Kenneth Blevins.

In order to be a candidate in Oklahoma, you either pay a filing fee to the Oklahoma State Election Board, or file a petition signed by 4% of the registered voters eligible to vote for the candidate in the election determined by using the latest voter registration report. Blevins elected to collect signatures rather than pay the $500 fee. Consequently, the Contest of Candidacy hearing centered on whether or not Blevins collected enough ACCURATE signatures to be considered a ballot candidate.

Both Amber and Wendi watched the video of the hearing posted by the Oklahoma State Election Board (see timestamp 4:59:15) and explained what happened and what concerned them about the hearing. According to both women, Oklahoma should archive the current voter records and re-register everyone in Oklahoma again to make sure the rolls contain actual Oklahoma electors. This was a fascinating conversation that truly MUST be watched – especially if you’re like me and don’t really understand as much about our election system as Wendi and Amber!

This final section is a bit longer, but it was just too important not to add – of course you can always just watch the full video – but in this section of the video toward the end, all four of us began talking about what is happening in Oklahoma. We have so few people voting and we’ve elected people who are becoming tyrants. For example, why were Cheryl Williams and I fired for pointing out that the Oklahoma County Election Board wasn’t following the law? Why couldn’t election officials have gotten together and worked WITH us to find a solution? Why yell at us and fire us and then sic the Attorney General AND District Attorney on us to investigate us? You’d think we’d have committed election fraud – or worse!

But it’s not just election officials in this state, it’s so many other NON-ELECTED bureaucrats! We shouldn’t even have unelected bureaucrats, why should they also attack the citizens they are appointed to SERVE? When we really got to talking about it, we all agree – we’re in trouble here in little ol’ Bible Belt, Conservative, Red State, Oklahoma…

Legislators Exempt Legislators And Others From PFAS Liability; Saundra Traywick – ROPE Report Short

Saundra Traywick of Oklahoma’s only Donkey Dairy, has been studying the effects of BIOSLUDGE (Humanure/Biosolids) since it was first dumped next to her farm several years ago.

After nearly being run off their property by the smell, Saundra found that this, so-called fertilizer made from sewage solids, can contain ‘forever chemicals’ like PFAS that have been shown to cause cancer and ‘gender-bending’ chemicals like atrizine. 

For three years, the Traywick’s have been working with Oklahoma senator Shane Jett to try and stop the use of biosludge in Oklahoma, where it’s usually spread on crop lands that are used for hay, or animal grazing. 



Unfortunately, at least one permit for the use of biosludge, belongs to an Oklahoma legislator – Representative Kevin Wallace, Chair of the House Appropriations and Budget Committee. 

How many other legislators are using biosludge on their farmland is unknown, however we do know that application is free for the farmer who uses it – unlike those who choose to pay for fertilizer application, or rent livestock to do that job. We also know from Saundra that no less than three bills have been run in the Oklahoma legislature to ban or otherwise control the use of biosludge, but none have passed. 

Today, HB2305 will not only NOT protect the people of Oklahoma from the toxic effects of biosludge in their drinking water and/or food, but – as the EPA gets closer to regulating the amount of PFAS in drinking water – it will EXEMPT the sellers of this crap, like Synagro and the end users who spread it on their property, to name a few. 

Just like BIG PHARMA’s vaccine manufacturers can inject people with substances all the while knowing they don’t ever have to be responsible for the end results, our Oklahoma House just voted nearly unanimously (thank you Rick West and Tom Gann for voting NO!) to protect everyone from the effects of biosludge – and the same with the Senate (and thanks to the whole 10 of you who voted NO! ๐Ÿ‘Š๐Ÿ’–) – but those who need protecting most – the PEOPLE.

Truly, it should be in the daily lexicon of every legislator – to ask before voting on ANY bill – does it protect the liberty of the people whom I represent? If it doesn’t, the VOTE must be NO. 

There’s no way a bill that seeks to ‘hold harmless’ those people perpetrating and/or allowing biosludge to effect Oklahomans through their food, air and water, is protecting their liberty! Instead of creating exemptions, legislators should be working together to BAN the use of biosludge across Oklahoma!

Watch the FULL video here on our Rumble and YouTube channels.

We Are Quickly Moving Away from A Rights-Based Society to a Value-Based Society

Jenni White, 4.12.24

After our interview with Julianne Romanello Wednesday morning, I felt it would be helpful to add a few links to allow people to further explore the premise of Rights-Based vs Value-Based governance.

At the outset of the podcast, we talked about property taxes and how, once the government taxes our property, we don’t own it anymore. This was arguably one of Jefferson’s biggest issue, which he delineated in the Declaration of Independence by the word ‘happiness’ in the phrase, “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. Why equate property with happiness?

One of the reasons the pilgrims left England for lands undiscovered, was the very difficult ability to hold property in a monarchical system. If property rights had not been previously prescribed and legally noted, the King was often considered the owner of all empty lands because he was King by right of God and God provided him the land. This land could be (and was) given to various title-holding individuals depending upon the monarch at the time, usually consisting of Lords, Bishops, Barons, etc., while all non-title-holders were forced to rent land from the King (or the closest title-holder). In fact, even if you were found hunting on the King’s land, you could be fined or otherwise punished. It mattered not if your children were starving and you were unable to find food, all the game on the King’s property was the King’s, end of discussion.

If the King created another Baron in the place of the previous, a renter could be thrown off the property so it could be bequeathed to a new ‘owner’. Obviously, this kind of instability for the vast majority of the English population did NOT create happiness. Thus, one of the rights among men that the Founders desired to enshrine in the Constitution, was the right to own property for oneself; not merely rent it from the Crown, OR ANOTHER GOVERNMENTAL FORM. This stability then, could create happiness of the kind that provided safety and security as the phrase, “A man’s home is his castle” was meant to convey.

Today, however, Oklahomans – like so many other citizens of so many other states – no longer own their own property, but rent it from the King (state), placing us right back where we were when we started.

Why would I say such a thing? Because, as McClain County Assessor Kendal Sacchieri told us – property taxes MUST be paid, or we’ll be thrown off ‘our’ property so that ‘our’ property can be sold to the highest bidder and the taxes paid to the King (state).

What creates property taxes? Look at the illustration below prepared by Larry Stein, Oklahoma County Assessor. It can be found here, with more explanation for the expenditure of County property tax dollars.

You’re property is not your own because nearly 60% of it goes to government schools – government schools who also receive appropriations from the legislature, monies from parimutuel betting, the lottery AND MORE! As I’ve asked perpetually since 2010 – HOW MUCH MONEY IS ENOUGH FOR SCHOOLS TO HAVE – especially when their results are dismal and rare few pupils educated in public schools can read or do math! Here are a few of the other ways public schools get money from an 1889 Institute paper on School Finance.

Please, someone explain to me why our PROPERTY is being attached for government education that already is funded via the appropriation mechanism?

Career Tech and College Tech Centers are also appropriated funds by the legislature. Here are their budget requests for 2020.

PLEASE, someone explain to me why our PROPERTY is being attached for MORE government education that is funded via the appropriation mechanism?

County government gets the next piece. To me, this is actually legitimate government expense. The County provides road repair and many other SERVICES from which taxpayers benefit. This, could be paid directly to the County as a tax – much like the taxes paid to the state – instead of attaching our property.

Cities and towns should be funded via their own taxes – like those on delivered merchandize (Amazon, etc.) and sales taxes collected within their boundaries (which they already get!) – your property SHOULD NOT BE TAXED TO RUN CITIES AND TOWNS.

The City/County Library should be funded via voluntary donations. Period. Yes, it is important to have repositories of knowledge, but large corporations are welcome to donate these facilities – as are citizens. Our PROPERTY SHOULD NOT BE TAXED to provide disgusting books to minors – which they do.

The City/County Health Department is another item that should be funded privately. There are many indigent clinics run by non-profits. Healthcare is NOT a function of government, it is a function of private economy whether you like that idea or not. The main function of government in America is THE PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS. Healthcare is not an individual right and has never been throughout history until the last several generations. Additionally, we all know that government-sponsored healthcare systems became armies of tyranny during COVID. I don’t want my tax dollars used to support tyranny in any form and I certainly don’t want my property seized to pay taxes to a group of people who want to force me to bow to healthcare mandates we’ve since learned DID NOTHING or killed us.

TIFs are a type of property tax that indebt property owners for economic development. You can read more on that here. There is no way property owners should allow ANY form of ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT to attach their property. Back in the ‘old days’ developers shouldered the risk of their developments – but they also owned all the rewards. Today, the PUBLIC is made to shoulder the risk of PRIVATE development, yet our property is taxed without us getting any REWARD at all. In many cases, the TIFF is for an office building or industrial park. Not only do the taxed property owners not reap any reward from this development, but they don’t even get to USE the property they are financing. Most TIFFs are sold to the public as – here, we’ll develop this area to bring in businesses from which you can possibly get a job. WHAT? Not only is there NO REWARD for the taxation of our property, but we might not even be able to become employed by the businesses being brought in through the development? Who in their right mind would give someone on the street the use of their car for the PROMISE that they’ll put gas in it when (if) they bring it back, yet people in cities and towns across Oklahoma actually fall for this scheme and accept the taxation of their property through a TIFF consistently. WAKE UP! STOP IT!

And so, to wrap up my most extensive piece ever on property taxes, please read this twice or three times. Once you understand the argument – because I believe you will – share it with friends AND your legislators. Property taxes are INHERENTLY wrong and must be stopped if Americans (Oklahomans) are to have true freedom.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑