Search

ROPE Report

Tag

Norman public schools

School-issued laptops have created a pornography crisis for America’s public school students

Norman public schools recently sent out a survey to parents to gauge their opinion of the district’s in-school smartphone policy, anticipating the passage of legislation that would severely restrict the use of phones by students during school hours. From “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”, parents are asked whether phones should be put away all day, used only during passing periods, used only for emergencies, et cetera. I opted for the strictest policy options given, but even then, I don’t believe it’s enough.

“Phone” is an insidious euphemism for these pocket-sized, high-powered computers that can be used to access the most explicit content imaginable. For the first time in human history, the most degenerate content in existence is instantly within our children’s reach, and, being children, they search it out. We as a society have consciously turned a blind eye to this hideous tech revolution, telling ourselves that kids aren’t accessing this garbage, and only using their phones for their intended purpose. We’re lying to ourselves, and instead of confronting this crisis directly, we’re allowing it to unfold without a whimper of protest, with catastrophic consequences for our kids’ developing minds.

The phones, though, aren’t even the worst part of this grotesque tech intrusion.

School-issued laptops have become the primary gateway for adolescents to access pornography, explicit music, and other degenerate content, and nothing at all is being done about it. At NPS, all middle school and high school children are issued laptops to be used for classwork. The problem is that these laptops also access the internet, and despite assurances from the school district that internet “filters” are in place, kids are able to access explicit content, corrupting them and setting them up for debilitating digital addictions for the rest of their lives.

Students also take these laptops home with them, using them on internet connections without any filters in place at all. If all NPS laptops were audited to find out how students have been using them, what would we discover?

This question was researched in 2023, and researchers found that 41% of students accessed explicit material during the school day.

A quick Google search of in-school laptops being used to access explicit content turns up endless news stories that read like every parent’s nightmare.

A story from January details how parents learned that their 4th grader was able to access “hardcore porn” on his school-issued laptop.

In a post published at HoweverItHappened, a parent described finding pornography on their 9 year old son’s laptop. The parent locked down all devices, and discovered that their son had searched for this content while at school.

In 2020, parents were horrified to discover that their middle schoolers were accessing pornography on school laptops. Parents of an 11-year old boy were devastated at what they found in their son’s browsing history. From the article:

““We feel almost robbed of our son’s innocence,” said the boy’s mom, who asked to remain anonymous. “It’s been really hard, I’ll be honest, on me for the past week.” Another parent, who also asked to remain anonymous to protect his family’s privacy, said his 9-year-old third-grader had also accessed extremely graphic content, mostly through Twitter.”

In 2017, auditors found that students at a Mississippi public school were using their school laptops to access explicit content.

Another article explains how kids can bypass existing school filters to access degenerate material through the use of a wifi hotspot, VPNs, proxy websites, or smart DNSs.

Explicit content isn’t the only problem. Many parents are infuriated to discover that their kids have been mindlessly browsing the web while at school, resulting in plummeting grades. Memphis parents found that their daughter had been watching YouTube all day long while in class, and apparently the teachers were either unable or unwilling to put a stop to it.

While the Children’s Internet Protection Act requires schools to monitor student’s usage of district-provided devices, it is clear that no amount of “monitoring” will solve this issue.

The current conversation surrounding internet-connected devices in our schools is fundamentally flawed. The question shouldn’t be “when or where”, but whether students should have access to this technology at all while on campus. They clearly should not. School should be a sanctuary away from our tech-saturated society. Students need to learn to live without their devices for at least 8 hours a day. If many can’t, then we need to confront the fact that these devices have become highly-addictive drugs, and begin treating them as such.

The surest way to remove laptops from our schools is to force the district to perform an audit. We would be so horrified at what was discovered that I believe our kids would return to pencil-and-paper learning within a week. The only problem now is how to force the NPS to perform the audit.

Through unrestricted access to explicit content, these devices destroy our children’s innocence before they’ve even begun puberty. And these devices are everywhere. The fact that our schools are giving them to students means that schools themselves are facilitating the destruction of the innocence of America’s school children. This is a national crisis that has been ignored long enough.

The solution isn’t “more filters” or “enhance monitoring” of student’s devices. It is the total removal of this technology from our schools, root and branch. We’ve allowed a Big Tech takeover of our schools without a single objection, and the result is horrific: children developing a life-long addiction to these devices and the content that they find. This may be Big Tech’s real goal: the creation of life-time customers. We must face this reality now, for our the sake of our children’s mental and emotional wellbeing, and their future.

________________________________________

Addendum: ROPE Report dealt with this in our interview with Kansas parent, Denise Roberts.

Norman elementary school assigns books sympathetic to illegal immigration

As much as I support Ryan Walters’ attempts to root out leftist ideology from our classrooms, it appears that the most damaging instances are flying completely under the radar, and finding their way into the classroom without anyone noticing.

A recent example of how students are being exposed to left-wing ideas is two books that have been assigned to fifth grade students at McKinley Elementary in their advanced reading course: “The Path to Paper Son”, by Grant Din, and “Louis Share Kim”, by Barbara D. Krasner. Both books can be listened to in their entirety in the YouTube link provided.

The books are fictionalized accounts of how Chinese immigrants in the 19th century tricked American immigration officials into allowing illegal Chinese immigrants to gain US citizenship by falsely claiming that Chinese nationals were a part of their family. The books paint a sympathetic portrait of this dishonest tactic, justifying it on the grounds that living in China was too dangerous for these Chinese citizens, and so they must immigrate to the US by any means necessary on humanitarian grounds.

The books are a part of the MyView Literacy program that is used as the primary curriculum at Norman Public Schools, and I believe the primary pipeline through which this political ideology is infiltrating our schools and reaching our students’ minds.

Are these books appropriate for impressionable elementary students? How will these books alter the worldview of young American children, particularly how it relates to our modern immigration crisis? We are experiencing the greatest crisis of illegal immigration that this country has experienced in decades, and justifications for allowing it to continue are identical with the justifications for the Chinese immigration described in these books.

The MyView curriculum appears designed to foster an emotional judgment of immigration long before the true facts of the negative effects of invasion-level immigration reaches our children, and long before they’ve developed the capacity and maturity to understand them. As we know, a deeply-held emotional prejudice will easily overpower facts learned later.

The implicit moral of these two books is that it is okay to allow illegal immigration, even if it means breaking the law, if doing so allows foreign illegals to escape homeland for a better life.

Is this really a lesson that we want our kids learning in school? This is virtually identical to the justifications used today by our leftist-dominated political and humanitarian institutions, that have allowed millions of unvetted and undocumented migrants to flow unimpeded into our country, with tens of thousands of Venezuelans, Haitians, and other nationals given automatic parole and flown in to the US to be settled in unsuspecting communities, bringing cultures, habits, and even crime, that are incompatible with the American communities that are forced to contend with these newcomers.

Books like this smuggle a pro-immigration worldview into our classrooms right under our noses, molding the worldview of our children to automatically support the waves of immigration, and opposing any attempts to stop the flood.

I would urge Ryan Walters to, instead of pushing bibles and chaplains in our schools, instead thoroughly scour the current reading curriculum, primarily MyView Literacy, for political activism disguised as ordinary reading material. This is the overriding manner in which leftist orthodoxy is finding its way into our schools, and it must be rooted out.

The same goes for the Second Step Social-Emotional Learning curricula. SEL has smuggled in leftist ideology far more successfully than any other curriculum, and yet there has been no state-wide effort to sift through this curriculum with a fine-tooth comb and ban it outright.

With our state reading levels sitting at embarrassing levels, why should SEL and other forms of stealth political activism be given priority? Why is there not a concerted effort to focus like a laser on real literacy and math proficiency, or, God forbid, typing proficiency? In our computer age, typing proficiency is vital, and yet a typing class has not been offered to my children in either elementary or middle school.

Our priorities are totally out of whack, and as a result we’re condemning our children to a diminished future.

Norman school to teach elementary students to identity “misinformation”

Written by guest-poster, Shane Smith

An email sent out by McKinley Elementary in Norman last week, informed parents that the school has been selected to participate in an “innovative research study examining how school librarians can help students learn to detect and avoid misinformation by developing their information literacy skills”.

While participation in the study itself is voluntary, all K-5 students will be taught the misinformation program curriculum from August to April.

The program itself, entitled “Awareness and Critical Thinking (ACT) Program: How School
Librarians Can Teach Children to Detect and Avoid Misinformation
”, was developed by Tara Zimmerman, assistant professor at the School of Library and Information Studies at Texas Women’s University. Her sole specialty for the past few years has centered around “misinformation”, and she’s received a $400,000 grant from the Laura Bush 21st Century
Librarian Program to fund her research.

A few of the papers she’s published on misinformation provide the trajectory of her target.

In 2020, she published a paper entitled, “COVID-19: Mask Misinformation and Social Noise”. The paper begins with this statement:

“Disinformation and misinformation are pervasive in unregulated social-media environments, which are used habitually for obtaining news.”

I think we know where this is going.

Further into the article she says:

“Facebook on July 20th, 2020 removed a group called themselves Unmasking America that had more than 9,000 members for spreading COVID19 misinformation (Lynos 2020). The group claimed that masks obstruct the flow of oxygen and have a negative psychological impact on wearers. Facebook responded to an inquiry from the Verge and stated that “We have clear policies against promoting harmful misinformation about COVID 19 and have removed this group while we review the others,” according to the Verge article. This is one of many groups on social media spreading lies and conspiracy theories about COVID19 and against wearing masks for various reasons. In the US, wearing masks has become a partisan issue and represents more of a political statement than a safety and health care guidance issue. Most social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and others are coming under pressure to encounter such negative messaging and take steps to minimize the spread of COVID19 misinformation.”

Yet another paper, published in 2022, “Misinformation and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy”, reads just as you’d expect:

“During the COVID-19 pandemic, anti-vaccine beliefs have been at an all-time high, and vaccine hesitancy has become a major threat to public health [1]. The World Health Organization has labeled the increased virulence of misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic an “infodemic” [2]. Throughout 2020, scientists, healthcare professionals, and politicians speculated about vaccine timelines, distribution, and effectiveness; and media platforms presented widely varying opinions as well as misinformation that negatively influenced people’s attitudes about COVID-19 vaccines [3]. By the end of 2020, the self-reported likelihood of getting vaccinated against COVID-19 had declined sharply from 74 % in April to 56 % in December [4]. While the availability of COVID-19 vaccines improved between the fall of 2020 and late spring 2021, indications of public distrust in vaccines continued. This public distrust contributed to waves of COVID-19 cases and deaths in the US, increasingly among those who were not vaccinated.”

There’s something archaic about Zimmerman’s papers, her attitude prevalent at the height of COVID hysteria, and later, her vaccine mandate hysteria that rings hollow today.

Masks didn’t prevent the spread of COVID. Neither did the vaccine. It’s almost common knowledge now, but both facts were branded as misinformation during the dark days of the COVID pandemic.

In fact, her continued study of “misinformation” feels like a discarded relic of the past. It might have held weight in 2020, or 2021, when any opinion not perfectly aligned with the official narrative surrounding COVID-19 was branded as misinformation, and censored. Even scientific research that failed to dovetail with the pronouncements of the public health establishment was blacklisted. We all remember it, and we’d rather not return to those dark days of censorship.

Zimmerman might, though. What else explains her passion for routing out or dismissing
altogether non-approved opinions?

“Misinformation” is not a neutral term.

It’s shown itself to be nothing more than a bludgeon used to silence right-wing criticisms of left-wing orthodoxy. During the authoritarian days of the pandemic, it was a powerful weapon used to silence critics by the thousands with one fell swoop. We remember the social media behemoths enacting a scorched earth policy of censorship at the behest of the Biden White House. But now, in the age of Elon-owned X, the term “misinformation” has lost its power. Like a T-Rex transformed into a chicken.

Professor Zimmerman clearly isn’t a neutral actor, and the ACT Program isn’t an objective
study. I fear that the goal of her program is less to teach children to think critically, and more to teach them to hold up a crucifix when confronted with unapproved opinions. “Get them while they’re young” is the new strategy among activists embedded within the public school system.

The ACT Program appears to be yet another attempt to cloak the wolf of left-wing orthodoxy in a sheep’s coat of scientific objectivity.

Watch for it in your child’s school RIGHT NOW. This is a national movement occurring BEFORE our elections. Check out: Media literacy is more than spotting fake news. How one librarian gives teens the tools to decide what to trust

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑