Search

ROPE Report

Tag

lawsuit

Former SD15 Candidate Robert Keyes, His Fight For Election Integrity, The Evidence In His Case And SB654 To Remove The Election Law At The Center Of It All

On Valentine’s Day, former SD15 candidate, Robert Keyes caught us up on his fight for election transparency in Oklahoma. It was a very interesting podcast and you can find the full live version on our YouTube and Rumble channels.

Robert ran for Senate against Lisa Standridge, the wife of previous office holder, Rob Standridge, who had termed out of office.

It is Keyes’ contention – which has not been proven wrong – that Lisa Standridge’s campaign manager broke Oklahoma election law by notarizing and collecting absentee ballots – something neither members of a campaign or the candidate can do according to existing state law.

Keyes lost by 51 votes and following the close of the election, his team of attorneys were able to document 41 instances of election irregularities – fifty-one of which would overturn the results. Robert recounts that the State Election Board (SEB) was not only not helpful in helping him get to the bottom of these irregularities, they actually blocked him from discovering information.

After the irregularities were discovered and documented – including the little nugget below

– Keyes and his attorneys came to an agreement with the Standridge’s attorneys and the SEB at a closed meeting that would allow the SEB to certify the election for Standridge while insuring Keyes that – among other points – the irregularities would be investigated. Unfortunately, when it was time to implement the agreement – both parties refused to uphold the agreement as promised to Keyes.

Dissatisfied with the outcome, Keyes – court reported documents from the meeting in hand – took both the SEB and the Standridge’s to the Oklahoma Supreme Court. The Supreme Court punted the case to Cleveland County Justice Jeff Virgin, who refused to make a ruling.

As an aside, the Honorable Judge Virgin is the son of longtime Norman attorney Blake Virgin, and the brother of Emily Virgin, formerly serving as a Democrat in the Oklahoma House of Representatives.

Hopefully, you’re scratching your head in wonder at why NO ONE in the commission of justice in central Oklahoma wants to attempt to UPHOLD JUSTICE and if you’re not, you should be. This situation should create actual fear in the citizenry of Oklahoma that Democracy in a state where all 77 counties voted for Trump – is dead.

Below is the Keyes case before the Oklahoma Supreme Court. Scroll through it and you will see the MANY, MANY examples of irregularities in Keyes’ election. This isn’t a complaint without merit from Keyes. There is substantial information here to suggest that our state’s election process is marred – and possibly improper – as I alleged during the time I was an alternate Oklahoma County Election Board member.

This is a short video of Mr. Keyes talking about the frustration he has surrounding this election – the number of irregularities that were found and the lack of ANY justice official willing to investigate the findings. In fact, he says that one of the most frustrating thing about his entire election has been that he believes there are bigger problems with the SEB than just one election.

Another very unfortunate and frustrating issue adjacent to this case, is the fact that Senate Pro Temp Lonnie Paxton – who narrowly won election to the Pro Temp post over challenger David Bullard – has authored SB654, which removes the 2 sections of law allegedly broken by Standridge’s campaign. While I’m all for repealing laws, these two pieces of Oklahoma election law SHOULD NOT BE REMOVED and, to me, it’s actually quite suspicious that this bill was authored in the first place after a close campaign with irregularities in which both the SEB and Standridges refused to uphold an agreed upon resolution.

This entire case should be concerning to every Oklahoma interested in election integrity in Oklahoma. We’ll continue to follow this case and bring you updates, however, we ask that you share this information with your friends – no matter WHAT political affiliation they may be – because without elections we can trust, we have very little by which to call ourselves Americans – let alone Oklahomans.

ADDENDUM: I think it might be important to note here that in 2008, Glenn Coffee – a long-time Oklahoma attorney – was Senate Co-Pro Temp. He appointed Paul Ziriax as Secretary of the State Election Board and Secretary of the Senate. Coffee was followed by Pro Temp Brian Bingman who continued Ziriax’ appointment. Bingman was followed by Pro Temp Greg Treat who also continued Ziriax’ appointment. Treat was followed by Pro Temp Lonnie Paxton, who also continued Ziriax’ appointment.

It is also interesting to note that Glenn Coffee has been hired to be the ‘Senior Legal Consultant’ to the Senate Republican Caucus this year by Ryan Overholt, the Senate’s Chief of Staff. Coffee, who made millions of dollars on the state’s opioid lawsuit, has left a thriving law practice to come to work for the Oklahoma Senate for $12,500 per month for 12 months. This seems like a step down, which prompts a number of questions.

Senate Leader Chooses Paul Ziriax for Dual Post in Senate/Election Board

November 20, 2008 | 12:32am

Senate President Pro Tempore Designate Glenn Coffee has announced his choice for Secretary of the Senate and State Election Board Secretary. Paul Ziriax, who has held the title of Leadership Assistant at the State Senate for the past six years, has been named to the dual posts.

The Pro Tempore selects the Secretary of the Senate, who must then be elected by a majority of members. Under Oklahoma law that individual also serves as State Election Board Secretary.

“Paul’s experience in both state and national government positions have prepared him well for these new responsibilities,” Coffee said. “I also know him to be a man of tremendous character and intellect, with an abiding respect for the political process and democracy. I know he will do an outstanding job on behalf of the people of Oklahoma.”

“Oklahoma has a national reputation for the efficient way in which our elections are conducted, and Michael Clingman should be commended for the great job he’s done as Secretary of the Senate and Secretary of the State Election Board,” stated Coffee. “I wish Michael the best of luck in his new role as director of the Office of State Finance.”

Before coming to work for the Senate, Ziriax was the Chief of staff and press secretary to former U.S. Congressman Wes Watkins. He serves on the State Capitol Preservation Commission and is a member of the Legislative Information and Communication Staff Section and Leadership Staff Section of the National Conference of State Legislatures. Ziriax earned a degree in Business Administration and Finance from Oklahoma State University, and is a member of the OSU Alumni Association.

The Secretary of the Senate directs the floor staff and oversees the preparation of daily printing and general publications and the content of forms used by the Senate for various reports and procedures. The Secretary is the custodian of all Senate records and provides assistance to the President Pro Tempore and the presiding officer. The State Election Board Secretary is the chief administrative officer of the State Election Board.

“I am deeply honored by the faith Senator Coffee has placed in me,” Ziriax said. “I have some big shoes to fill. I am thrilled with this new opportunity, and look forward to continuing my public service.”

Ziriax, age 37, is a native of Claremore, Oklahoma, but currently resides in Edmond with his wife, Lisa, and their nearly 2-year-old daughter, Allie. They are members of Faith Bible Church in Edmond.

The full Senate will vote on Ziriax’s appointment when they return for an organizational day on January 6, 2009.

Contact info

Senator Coffee’s Office: (405) 521-5636

Edmond Public Schools Discriminates and the OTA Good Ole Boy System Wins Again

ROPE Report LIVE for Friday, December 6th included our interview with Edmond attorney, Richard Lebarthe, who talked about his lawsuit against Edmond Public schools and a bit about his fight with the Oklahoma Transportation Authority.

December 5th, Richard joined Oklahomans for Responsible Transportation at a meeting of the Oklahoma Council of Bond Oversight.

Check out this post from ORT “Too Many Red Flags to Approve a 1.5 Billion Dollar OTA Bond Issue Without Due Diligence“, it covers the entire issue! It also has Richard’s letter to the Council at the bottom. Please read it, but I’d like to add the last paragraph here:

Accordingly, Oklahomans for Responsible Transportation and Oklahomans for Transparency in Government request that the Council of Bond Oversight postpone any decision on the proposed OTA bond offering until a full feasibility study and compliance review can be completed by an outside third party. We also request that any future OTA bond offerings be postponed until the State Auditor completes the investigative audit ordered by the Attorney General.

Seriously? Both groups – through their attorney – were only asking for the Council to WAIT A MINUTE WHILE A FEW FACTORS WERE REVIEWED FIRST. Yet the Council voted unanimously to grant the bonds to the OTA. Wow.

Here’s what Richard says about the meeting:

Please, PLEASE, go the the Oklahomans For Responsible Transportation website and follow them on social media. Oklahomans MUST stop the OTA and the Good ‘Ole Boy system propping them up or we’ll get to the point where we can’t afford to travel in Oklahoma, period.

The other topic Michael and I covered with Richard on Friday was a recap of the lawsuit Richard filed for Michael and numerous other parents of Edmond Public Schools, arguing that they had discriminated against their children because of their vaccination status.

If you’ll remember, during the COVID YEARS (eye roll), schools could – and would – arbitrarily tell parents that their kids had to stay home if they ‘contact traced’ them and thought they were at risk of developing COVID. Edmond parents filed suit against EPS because they were discriminating against kids who hadn’t had the vaccine with their policy. So, if you were vaccinated, you were neither contact traced nor sent home, but if you hadn’t been vaccinated, you were contract traced and sent home for 10 days if EPS believed you had been near a COVID positive person within 10 days.

Thanks to Richard, Edmond parents prevailed against EPS in court – demonstrating that EPS’ policy WAS flawed and discriminatory. Hilariously, EPS literally put out a statement to the press after the ruling that they were disappointed with the decision, though the court essentially said what Richard says in his comments below – EPS essentially coerced parents to vaccinate their kids for them to go to school.

It’s a shame parents have to pay an attorney to sue their own schools, but many parents today are having to do just that.

Public Schools Have Zero Accountability To Taxpayers – Just Look At What Happens When They Are Sued!

I remember a song from the ’60’s whose chorus says, “I fought the law and the law won” (here is a version by the Clash for you younger folks LOL). It reminds me so much of public education in Oklahoma – and probably across the nation, actually. Here’s why.

April 12th, 2022, Brice Chaffin – a taxpayer in the district of Stillwater Public Schools – attended a school board meeting to discuss his concern about allowing boys to use the girl’s bathrooms.

Addressing the Board from the podium, Chaffin began his remarks by discussing the forms of law – natural law, physical law, spiritual law. What happened after that really requires viewing, so check out the original video below. It’s only a bit over 3 minutes.

You may view the entire Stillwater Board meeting for April 12, 2022 here.

If you haven’t watched the video by this point in the piece, you really have to. It’s the only way to understand the derision with which Brice was treated by nearly every single member of the Board. As he’s being told he has to actually leave the building, the Board is laughing and carrying on as though Chaffin (not with a long A, but a short ‘a’ as is the correct sound for a vowel before two consonants – but this is a school board, what would they know about English rules?) a piece of gum stuck to their shoe. It’s simply gross.

After this egregious act of silencing a district taxpayer before he had even completed speaking for the time allowed by the Board, ROPE and Maria Seidler of Legal Overwatch for Parent’s Rights, filed a suit against each member of the Stillwater School Board citing the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act in May.

Press statements and the filed lawsuit can be found here.

Please note; all that Brice and ROPE were asking, was for the SPS Board to apologize to Chaffin for the way he was treated. THAT’S ALL. No monetary damages, no compensation for time, no payment of our attorney fees. We asked only for an APOLOGY.

The Judge appointed to the case was Payne County Associate District Judge, Steven Kistler, appointed by Brad Henry (D) to the position in 2008.

The lawyers for Stillwater Public Schools, Rosenstein, Fist and Ringold (RFR), are well-versed in education law – it’s one full subset of their entire practice. Of course, they asked the court to dismiss the suit.

In July, Judge Kistler ruled against RFR’s request for dismissal and scheduled a pre-trial hearing for November, that was moved to October.

Unfortunately, Kistler denied Seidler’s motion, but after hearing the arguments of both side’s attorneys, refused to rule from the bench, saying instead that he was going to review the video again and, following, supply a written ruling to the parties through the court.

In April of 2023, Maria Seidler was a guest on our podcast, ROPE Report Live, where she updated us on the case. You can find that video on our Rumble and YouTube channels.

Essentially, Judge Kistler ruled against us and Brice and for SPS, literally providing no support for his decision. It was simply something to the effect of, “I’m ruling for Stillwater Public Schools”, period. If we wanted to have any notion about his thinking as to why, we weren’t going to get it. (You can find that specific information at 33 minutes almost exactly on the live video)

Following Kistler’s (bizarre) decision, SPS’ attorneys then file a lawsuit against Chaffin and ROPE for court costs and attorney’s fees. Because we filed our suit under the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act, this was a real surprise. The Act does not allow for court costs or attorney’s fees to be collected UNLESS the suit is won and the attorney’s fees and court costs are to be paid by the governmental entity that was found at fault. The private citizen or organization suing the governmental entity is not to pay court costs or attorney’s fees for the other party, even if they lose.

Here are the costs submitted to Stillwater Public Schools by Rosenstein, Fist an Ringold TO KEEP FROM APOLOGIZING TO A COMMUNITY MEMBER!

Yet and again, however, ROPE and Chaffin were back in court with the intrepid Maria by our side, trying to defend ourselves – when we shouldn’t have had to – from paying nearly 45 THOUSAND dollars in attorney’s fees and court costs.

Fortunately, the judge actually HAD read the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act and ruled against Rosenstein, Fist and Ringold (and SPS) and for Chaffin and ROPE, but it was at that court proceeding that Seidler and Chaffin learned something interesting.

The two were approached by several attorneys who told them they were sorry about the first ruling and that they believed we had a case. In fact, the attorneys identified Judge Kistler as an ‘activist’ judge who would have never ruled with us because of the subject matter and defendants. This information, led Maria to expound strenuously against ‘activist’ judges in this ROPE Report Short from that April’s interview.

We went on to file an appeal in Payne County, but our appeal was lost. Though we thought about filing an appeal to the Supreme Court, the costs are prohibitive and made little sense to any of us (from an AI answer to a search for Oklahoma Supreme Court costs: The total estimated cost of appealing to the Oklahoma Supreme Court can range from $2,750 to $14,000 or more, depending on the complexity of the case and the number of briefs filed.)

So here are your takeaways:

Listen to what Brice says here; Stillwater Public Schools LIED to pastors and other members of the community about the policy of allowing boys in girl’s bathrooms by telling them nothing was going on. They only found out for certain, when a woman went to her pastor and told him what she had personally seen!

If a public school offends your Constitutional – or other – rights, and you decide to sue them, you will pay for YOUR attorneys AND THE SCHOOLS ATTORNEYS because your tax dollars go to the school and the school is PAYING A FIRM OF ATTORNEYS TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS TO KEEP FROM HAVING TO APOLOGIZE TO A COMMUNITY MEMBER. We discuss that in this segment:

But it only gets worse. What happens if we had sued SPS for tens of thousands – or millions of dollars? Does the school have to pay that? What about the employees that caused the issues?

A Kingfisher Public Schools family sued Kingfisher Public Schools for some horrible hazing incidents that happened under the watchful eye of the KPS coach. The court awarded the family a 5 MILLION dollar settlement for the case. Will the Coach pay that? What about the school board that hired the Coach and allowed him to continue on in his position after numerous complaints from the community? What about the Superintendent? Nope.

A Daily Oklahoman article sums it up just in the title alone: “Angry taxpayers to confront Kingfisher school board about $5 million settlement of hazing case”. Why are Kingfisher taxpayers angry about a lawsuit that didn’t involve them? “Property owners in the Kingfisher school district are mad because they’re being told their taxes will go up for three years to pay $3.75 million of the settlement. Estimates are the increase could be as much as 12%.” You read it right! Yup.

Kingfisher school district taxpayers will pay the cost of the lawsuit settlement against the district.

Now tell me. Where in the world is the accountability for any public school TO the taxpayers whose money they take – either in property taxes or in appropriations by the legislature?

So let’s discuss that as well. Oklahoma’s academic scores are in the toilet. Across Oklahoma, less than half of ALL students are proficient in English and math, yet the Oklahoma legislature – again this year, after what they termed an HISTORIC INVESTMENT of tens of millions of dollars in education in 2023 – have done it again.

This is the website that contains the budget for Oklahoma for 2024. A total of $13.2 BILLION dollars. Education? Yeah, that’s a NEW appropriation of $45 MILLION dollars to a total $7.9 BILLION dollar budget. Who says public education is underfunded? Why would we fund them at all? We have ZERO control over them and the people we elect to take the reigns of control over them, simply throw money at the problem and move on.

Share this far and wide – every single Oklahoma taxpayer should know exactly where there money is going and what they are, or are NOT getting for it.

ROPE’s New Podcast “The ROPE Report” Debuted This Week (4.26.23) With Maria Seidler Discussing ROPE’s Lawsuit Against Stillwater Public Schools

Broadcast live to ROPE’s Twitter, Facebook and YouTube accounts, from 9am to 10am Wednesdays and Fridays every week (and uploaded to our Rumble channel), the ROPE Report aims, not only to discuss current education issues being decided in the legislature and the State School Board, but issues in education that can help parents make better choices about the educations they wish to provide their children.

Tuning into the live broadcast can allow you to ask questions of the guests, or comment, but if you miss the live feed, you can find the recordings available on all the social media outlets mentioned above.

Please watch Maria talk about our lawsuit with Stillwater Public Schools. It’s quite eye-opening! Especially about the part where SPS sues us for attorney fees and generates more court costs after our ONLY request in the lawsuit was AN APOLOGY. SPS literally spent nearly 60 thousand taxpayer dollars NOT to apologize to our friend Brice Chaffin for using a police officer to escort him from the podium before his 3 minute comment time was through and after reading scripture. This particular issue is an absolutely shining example of how out of control many public schools are and how much they dislike simply doing the right thing for parents and the community that support them with their tax dollars.

Judge Denies Stillwater Public School’s Dismissal Request – ROPE/Chaffin Lawsuit Scheduled for Pre-Trial Hearing in November

In an awesome victory for ROPE’s case with Stillwater parent Brice Chaffin against Stillwater Public Schools (SPS) and Stillwater School Board members filed May 4th (2022), Maria Seidler successfully argued against the dismissal of our lawsuit requested of the court by SPS.  ROPE and Chaffin, led by attorney Seidler, will meet SPS again in court in November for a pre-trial hearing.

Friday, July 22 (2022) at 9:00am, approximately 12-15 members of the Stillwater community, Brice Chaffin, ROPE Board Members Nancy Blalock and Tracey Montgomery, Attorney Maria Seidler and I waited in courtroom 302 of the Payne County Courthouse for Judge Kistler to hear our response to the dismissal request by Stillwater Public Schools of our lawsuit against SPS and individual SPS Board Members.

Attorney Maria Seidler with members of the Stillwater Community inside
Payne County Courthouse after court concluded

Attorney Maria Seidler won her argument against the dismissal request of SPS by pleading that the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act does provide a mechanism by which a party can initiate a lawsuit for relief of violations of their religious freedom.

Though Judge Kistler did remove ‘The Board’ as a collective from the lawsuit, the Stillwater Public Schools District and each individual Board Member – in their role as SPS Board Member – involved in the meeting the night of April 12, 2022 when Brice Chaffin was removed from the podium by Stillwater police for reciting scripture, will remain in the suit.

Jenni White, ROPE President, Brice Chaffin, Parent, Tracey Montgomery,
ROPE Parental Rights Director, Nancy Blalock, ROPE Treasurer

This was excellent news.  The public elects each individual Board Member and every member of the public should expect that each individual school board member will follow the Constitution and the laws of the State of Oklahoma in commission of their duties as they are sworn to do when taking their seat on the Board.

A rather jaw-dropping moment occurred in the courtroom after the Judge denied the dismissal and declared a pre-trial hearing would be scheduled for November.  One of SPS’ attorneys (there were two) addressed the judge.  He noted that the specific school board meeting addressed by the ROPE/Chaffin lawsuit had been recorded and widely disseminated.  He then told the Judge that SPS did not want a jury trial.

Gosh, why could that be?  The fact that if a jury had to rule on the way SPS School Board Members treated Chaffin based on the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act during that meeting it would result in a slam dunk decision in our favor?  Most likely, yes.

ROPE and Chaffin are asking for nothing more in the lawsuit than for a public apology to be made to Chaffin and fees to reimburse attorney Seidler.  We are not asking for anything else.

Here are a couple things to think about:

  • Taxpayers paid for TWO ATTORNEYS to deal with a lawsuit that could have been resolved via a PUBLIC APOLOGY for mistreatment of a parent and community member by SPS Board Members during one of their regularly scheduled open meetings.
  • How much money will it cost taxpayers – and how much will the ATTORNEYS MAKE OFF TAXPAYERS – to fight a suit in which SPS is clearly in the wrong and over a simple public apology?

Government schools are out of control.  Parents know this, but many don’t know what to do about it, or want to overlook the fact because they don’t want to go against teachers and administrators who might single out their child for retribution.  

Hopefully – if we win the lawsuit and SPS is forced to publicly apologize – it will go a long way toward giving accountability of school board members back to their communities and the citizens who elect them.

The only way it doesn’t, is if parents and citizens don’t capitalize on the win and work to hold their own school boards just as accountable for their behavior.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑